Re: origin/branchname and tracking branch pointing to different commits?
- From
- Eugene Sajine <euguess@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 28, 2010, 17:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTik7bleuzqnMWMJoWljQ5zD0YbwBsFjZT5IzkV0q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100608183007.GA31293@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:27:14PM -0400, Eugene Sajine wrote: > >> I'm coming back to this topic as i see some confusion growing about >> such behavior. Every now and then users come across this problem and >> they expect pull to *really* behave as fetch and merge so it will >> cause the update of remote/branchname branch. And it is kind of >> difficult to justify why they have to do git fetch after pull... >> >> Can somebody, please, take a look? > > This was discussed a while back: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/127163 > > and I even posted a patch, but never followed up (I think mostly just > due to being busy).. There is some concern about unexpected ref updates, > though. > > -Peff >
Jeff, Junio
Could you, please, advise if there is any resolution on the patch?
Thanks a lot, Eugene