Re: origin/branchname and tracking branch pointing to different commits?
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jun 29, 2010, 22:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100629223919.GB5668@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vocet8ws2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:27:09PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> I have a slight suspicion that such an "unexpected ref update" is not a > big issue anymore. So in principle, I think it is fine to change the > behaviour of "git fetch $there $these_explicit_refs" to additionally > follow the configured remote tracking ref globbing patterns. > > Because > > (1) the old patch was never tested in a production context (I don't think > it even hit 'pu'); > > (2) I offhand do not know how much the codebase changed in the area that > would affect the assumptions the patch made back then; and > > (3) we will be in feature freeze for 1.7.2 anyway; > > I would rather not be the one who is forward-porting the patch myself > if I can avoid it, however.
I am probably the best person to take another look at it (though I would be fine if somebody else wants to volunteer).
Right now I am in the process of switching day jobs and doing an inter-state move, so it will probably be a month before I have a lot of git time.
-Peff