Re: Difference between 'git rebase' and 'git rebase -m'
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 17, 2010, 11:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTik7RML10gyQ19OV0KAH8Mn3=VZe92kU1qxER7wO@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20101116182749.GC14552@burratino>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Joshua Jensen wrote: > >> I'm curious as to why 'git rebase -m' isn't the default and what the >> real difference is between 'git rebase' and 'git rebase -m'. > > git rebase is faster. :)
Perhaps a config option to let people to default to -m. Or perhaps they can just make an alias.
By the way, can we make rebase even faster? Rebasing ~20 patches or more seems slow to me. I don't know much how patching works though.
-- Duy