From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:43:50 GMT
Subject: Re: Difference between 'git rebase' and 'git rebase -m'
Message-ID: <AANLkTik7RML10gyQ19OV0KAH8Mn3=VZe92kU1qxER7wO@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101116182749.GC14552@burratino>

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Joshua Jensen wrote:
>
>> I'm curious as to why 'git rebase -m' isn't the default and what the
>> real difference is between 'git rebase' and 'git rebase -m'.
>
> git rebase is faster. :)

Perhaps a config option to let people to default to -m. Or perhaps
they can just make an alias.

By the way, can we make rebase even faster? Rebasing ~20 patches or
more seems slow to me. I don't know much how patching works though.
-- 
Duy