Re: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server.
- From
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 11, 2010, 16:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTi=6hXj_a1X-HwYWvWt4_pBto_OQgkWE3VsDmEsJ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1281544234.5107.25.camel@localhost>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:30 PM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 12:18 -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote: >> Out of curiosity, why fall back to one chunk at a time? It seems to >> me that IMAP should be able to still support multiple outstanding >> requests in that case, but you'd just get errors on the latter chunks. >> >> It is just that there was no point optimizing the workaround case? > > There wasn't a lot of point in optimising it.
Say no more :)
I code on some IMAP clients occasionally and I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something important.
Thanks!
Avery