From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:39:53 GMT
Subject: Re: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server.
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=6hXj_a1X-HwYWvWt4_pBto_OQgkWE3VsDmEsJ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1281544234.5107.25.camel@localhost>

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:30 PM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 12:18 -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, why fall back to one chunk at a time?  It seems to
>> me that IMAP should be able to still support multiple outstanding
>> requests in that case, but you'd just get errors on the latter chunks.
>>
>> It is just that there was no point optimizing the workaround case?
>
> There wasn't a lot of point in optimising it.

Say no more :)

I code on some IMAP clients occasionally and I just wanted to make
sure I wasn't missing something important.

Thanks!

Avery