Re: [PATCH 00/16] Subtree clone proof of concept
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 2, 2010, 22:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTi=309R5e9TOGSRrtqe5u_5p5U2Xk7oHzez5+oOp@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTims5Xq67QXaE54bCTHP-BZSNRVsJnUKM6YJjt2G@mail.gmail.com>
2010/8/2 Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> haven't tested it further. Space consumption is 24MB (58MB for full >> repo). Not really impressive, but if one truely cares about disk >> space, he/she should also use shallow clone. > > 58 MB for full repo? What are you counting? For me, I get 25M:
My number 24MB was incorrect because process_tree() leaked too many blobs. It should have been 16MB. Anyway I have updated my series and put it here (to spam git mailing less)
http://repo.or.cz/w/git/pclouds.git/shortlog/refs/heads/subtree (caveat: constantly rebased tree)
if you still want to play with it. For number lovers, fetching only Documentation from linux-2.6.git took 94MB (full repo 366MB). Yeah Documentation was an easy target.
-- Duy