Show 23 quoted lines
> Le 9 févr. 2026 à 17:21, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> a écrit :
>
> "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc b/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc
>>> index b0b920144a6..115882edab1 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc
>>> +++ b/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc
>>> @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
>>> the current conflict to update the files in the working
>>> tree, allow it to also update the index with the result of
>>> resolution. `--no-rerere-autoupdate` is a good way to
>>> - double-check what `rerere` did and catch potential
>>> + double-check what linkgit:git-rerere[1] did and catch potential
>>> mismerges, before committing the result to the index with a
>>> separate `git add`.
>> Minor: should this adjacent be linkgit too? I thought yes, but on
>> second read we really are talking about the command.
>> Anyway, agreed that rerere should get linked. Thanks!
>
> If you are happy with the end result, I would not complain, but
> which _other_ potential thing were you wondering if it should
> acquire "linkgit:"?