From: Ben Knoble <ben.knoble@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 23:12:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: rerere-options.adoc: link to git-rerere(1)
Message-ID: <A9E7502B-3AAC-4242-9BAA-47D5B4C7D151@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqzf5h36dc.fsf@gitster.g>


> Le 9 févr. 2026 à 17:21, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> a écrit :
> 
> "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc b/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc
>>> index b0b920144a6..115882edab1 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc
>>> +++ b/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc
>>> @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
>>>       the current conflict to update the files in the working
>>>       tree, allow it to also update the index with the result of
>>>       resolution.  `--no-rerere-autoupdate` is a good way to
>>> -       double-check what `rerere` did and catch potential
>>> +       double-check what linkgit:git-rerere[1] did and catch potential
>>>       mismerges, before committing the result to the index with a
>>>       separate `git add`.
>> Minor: should this adjacent be linkgit too? I thought yes, but on
>> second read we really are talking about the command.
>> Anyway, agreed that rerere should get linked. Thanks!
> 
> If you are happy with the end result, I would not complain, but
> which _other_ potential thing were you wondering if it should
> acquire "linkgit:"?

Doh, typo: the « git add » as Kristoffer read my mind ;)