Re: Suggestions for "What's cooking"
- From
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
- Date
- Sep 12, 2012, 22:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <A7A1DB46082142E683753CFBC0A22A6B@PhilipOakley>
- In-Reply-To
- <5050E0CA.7080907@web.de>
From: "Jens Lehmann" <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:21 PM
Show 20 quoted lines
> Am 11.09.2012 21:41, schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> Thanks. I wish all others paid attention to "What's cooking" like >> you did here. >> >> And if it is hard to do so for whatever reason, suggest a better way >> for me to publish "What's cooking" or an equivalent (I am interested >> in finding the least bureaucratic way to help people and keep the >> balls rolling). > > I think "What's cooking" makes lots of sense in its current form > as one gets a very good overview over current development tracks. > > Maybe in addition it would be nice to email the author(s) of a > series when the state changes or new comments are added (and to > only include the relevant part from "What's cooking" there). For > me it's not a big problem as I just have to grep for "submodule" > to get the bits I care about, but I suspect others might have to > invest much more time to check the current state of their series > and may appreciate being mailed directly when something happens. > Opinions?
My comment, as a simple reader, is that I misread the order of the items, in that I miss-associate the description paragraph with the * title _below_. That is, I see the description first and then read on...
Thinking about it, if the description paragraph was indented by one space then the * title would create that obvious content indent that (I am) would be expected.
Obviously only a useful suggestion if it's easy to implement...
Philip