Re: Suggestions for "What's cooking"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 13, 2012, 18:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vmx0t94rc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAH5451kmwZehys4nL+NV8m8VGjDJtkSxru3o44_J_d3jD5ipxA@mail.gmail.com>
Andrew Ardill <andrew.ardill@gmail.com> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Currently, the output for each branch looks something like: > * <branch-name> (<creation-date>) <number-of-commits> > (<merge-status>) > [list-of-commits] > (<branch-usage>) > <long-description> > <notes-and-memoranda> > <next-steps> > > and these are grouped by current integration status (new, graduated, > stalled etc)
Yes. Thanks for a concise summary.
Show 11 quoted lines
> A format that would make this information easier for me to parse would > be something like: > > <short-branch-description> > <long-branch-description> > <notes> > <next-steps> > * <branch-name> (<creation-date>) <number-of-commits> > (<merge-status>) > [list-of-commits] > (<branch-usage>)
I do not see how it makes any sense to have the "This is where the section begins with, and its name is this" line in the middle of a block indented in such a way. Care to explain?
I can see some people may care more about the description than the list of commits [*1*], though.
[Footnote]
*1* It however is an indication that the title of each commit needs to be improved to convey enough information so that I do not have to write the branch description myself for them.