Re: stgit: lost all my patches again
- From
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 4, 2007, 13:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <9e4733910710040606j75caa6bcn1e97e59c1285eb4b@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071004083304.GB17778@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
On 10/4/07, Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Mmmph. This is not the only StGit command that's apparently not safe > to run from a subdirectory. See e.g. https://gna.org/bugs/?9986. > > I plan to do some StGit hacking this weekend. I guess subdirectory > safeness ought to be at the top of my list ...
Isn't a rollback log fairly easy to implement? Is there a single SHA after each operation? If so just record the commands and the sha to rollback.
I have also messed things up more than once using 'git merge linus' instead of 'stg rebase linus'. Should 'git merge' have a check to see if stg is active and refuse to run?
-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com