From: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:06:22 GMT
Subject: Re: stgit: lost all my patches again
Message-ID: <9e4733910710040606j75caa6bcn1e97e59c1285eb4b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20071004083304.GB17778@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>

On 10/4/07, Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> wrote:
> Mmmph. This is not the only StGit command that's apparently not safe
> to run from a subdirectory. See e.g. https://gna.org/bugs/?9986.
>
> I plan to do some StGit hacking this weekend. I guess subdirectory
> safeness ought to be at the top of my list ...

Isn't a rollback log fairly easy to implement? Is there a single SHA
after each operation? If so just record the commands and the sha to
rollback.

I have also messed things up more than once using 'git merge linus'
instead of 'stg rebase linus'. Should 'git merge' have a check to see
if stg is active and refuse to run?

-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com