Re: Reverting an uncommitted revert

> On Wed, 20 May 2009, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
>
>> El 20/5/2009, a las 5:35, Nicolas Pitre escribió:
>>
>>> Having a "trash" reflog would solve this unambiguously.  That  
>>> could also
>>> include your index example above.  However, in the index case, I'd
>>> record a reflog entry only if you're about to discard a previously  
>>> non
>>> committed entry.  If you do:
>>>
>>> 	$ git add foo
>>> 	$ git add bar
>>> 	$ git commit
>>> 	$ hack hack hack
>>> 	$ git add foo
>>>
>>> then in this case there is nothing to be lost hence no additional  
>>> entry
>>> in the "trash" reflog.
>>
>> That's true in the example you provide, but it doesn't really  
>> handle Jeff's
>> initial example ("git add" twice on the same file), where it is  
>> possible to
>> throw away intermediate state (by overwriting).
>
> Did I disagree with Jeff's original example?