Re: [PATCH] Use fast-forward
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 24, 2009, 14:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <94a0d4530910240717i7c8fe973w2623d095daf04ca6@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20091024220709.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Quoting Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> > >> As suggested in the mailing list, now I've replaced all instances of 'fast >> forward' with 'fast-forward'. > > I had an impression that the consensus from the previous > discussion was that there is no such consensus that this > is an improvement, because there isn't a clear-cut rule?
I don't think anyone wants to preserve the current inconsistent use, and I haven't seen arguments in favor of 'fast forward' either. My understanding was that the comments were in favor of 'fast-forward' but making it consistent across the code-base:
http://marc.info/?l=git&m=125532404330701&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=git&m=125535210203730&w=2
-- Felipe Contreras