From: Felipe Contreras Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:17:47 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use fast-forward Message-ID: <94a0d4530910240717i7c8fe973w2623d095daf04ca6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20091024220709.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Nanako Shiraishi wrote: > Quoting Felipe Contreras > >> As suggested in the mailing list, now I've replaced all instances of 'fast >> forward' with 'fast-forward'. > > I had an impression that the consensus from the previous > discussion was that there is no such consensus that this > is an improvement, because there isn't a clear-cut rule? I don't think anyone wants to preserve the current inconsistent use, and I haven't seen arguments in favor of 'fast forward' either. My understanding was that the comments were in favor of 'fast-forward' but making it consistent across the code-base: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=125532404330701&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=git&m=125535210203730&w=2 -- Felipe Contreras