Re: [PATCH] Revert "Declare both git-switch and git-restore experimental"

> Hi Kristoffer,
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> On 20/02/2024 10:36, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024, at 10:29, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
>>> This reverts commit 4e43b7ff1ea4b6f16b93a432b6718e9ab38749bd.
>>> Version 2.44 is approaching, almost 5 years after the introduction of
>>> these two commands, it then looks safe to remove this experimental
>>> status.
>>
>> Is this only based on the amount of time passed? Has there been any
>> relevant discussions on the mailing list that discuss how mature these
>> commands are and if they should be changed (with presumably a “no” to
>> the question about being changed)?
>
> It is only based on the amount of time passed, indeed.
>
> I initially wanted to start a discussion on the mailing list: "is it
> normal these commands are still marked as experimental?". Then I saw the
> patch introducing this status, which was suggesting doing a revert in
> version 2.24 or 2.25. That's why I sent this, to start the discussions
> with a patch that is ready to apply. Is it not OK to do that here?
>
> Also, when I quickly looked at the history, I didn't see any behaviour
> changes since their introduction. Maybe there was a minor change with
> commit 088018e34d ("restore: default to HEAD when combining --staged and
> --worktree"), but it looks more like a fix than a behaviour change.