Re: quick bare clones taking longer?
- From
- Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 10, 2007, 22:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <91705d080705101508y26eabb37oaf90aa4d9a7e239a@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vbqgsibrr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On 5/10/07, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists@gmail.com> writes: > > > In fact, all POSIX shells should support `cd -P' according to the spec, so it > > should probably just be used directly instead of hoping that /bin/pwd exists. > > > > (cd -P "$1" && (cd .git ; pwd)) 2>/dev/null > > > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/cd.html > > Yes but no ;-). I've said this a few times on the list in the > past, but I'll repeat it again for new people. > > We reject something whose portability in question by saying > "It's not _even in_ POSIX". We on the other hand try to refrain > from saying "POSIX says you are supposed to have it, so screw > people that are not fully POSIX".
Yes, I suppose. At the same time, git already implicitly requires more than, say, a Bourne shell. Functions, $( ) command substitution, ${} parameter expansion, $(( )) arithmetic expansion, etc. These are all standard in a POSIX shell, but may or may not exist in other shell variants.
-- Dan