Re: question concerning branches
- From
Jacob Helwig <jacob.helwig@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 19, 2009, 19:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8c9a060908191253q2ad30056vc26227cfe7bb438@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4a8c51f5@wupperonline.de>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:45, Ingo Brueckl<ib@wupperonline.de> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > But as software development often is something where you are coding on > several issues at the same time which can't be committed immediately, it > sounds that 'stash' is the developer's best friend. > > Ingo >
There is no problem with having temporary commits on local branches, however.
Quite frequently, I'll "git commit -a -m 'Temp commit'; git checkout other-branch". As long as you don't make these temporary commits public, it's very easy to munge them (See: "git rebase --interactive <commitish>", and "git reset --soft <commitish>").
-Jacob