Re: question concerning branches
- From
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 19, 2009, 18:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <32541b130908191107v2ab6752awb43f521f805b5f1a@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4a8c373f@wupperonline.de>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Ingo Brueckl<ib@wupperonline.de> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Within a git repository, I do: > > git branch test > git checkout test > # edit foo.bar > git checkout master > > I'd expect that master is in the exactly same unchanged state it was at > branching time, but what a surprise, foo.bar is modified here, too!
You seem to have forgotten the "git commit" step before switching back to master. You have a modified file in your repository; what did you *want* to happen when you switched branches? (Many people find the current behaviour very convenient.)
You might also want to look at the "git stash" command.
Avery