Re: [PATCHv5 3/3] gitweb: gravatar url cache

> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Junio C Hamano<gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> I think the cache is placed at the wrong level (it doesn't have to be a
>> GRavatar_url_cache, but can be a general avatar_url_cache).
>
> I'm not sure about it. The URL depends on email and size (can you use
> arrays as hash keys in Perl?) , and the email part might be the same
> but the size part might differ across separate calls (in theory; in
> practice avatars in a view are presently all the same size; but for
> example if we were to autodetect email addresses in commit messages,
> we might have both single- and double- sided avatars in the same
> page). By hashing on email+size only we would lose the benefit of
> cache when using the same avatar at separate sizes.
>