Re: cgit vs. gitweb
- From
- Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 26, 2006, 00:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8c5c35580612251644u26fde33aoe23d331c9192f8e7@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <200612260132.41062.jnareb@gmail.com>
On 12/26/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, which version of gitweb did you use (shortened sha1 of > commit, or result of git-describe)?
Results from ab used gitweb/1.4.4.3.gd4ada (pulled tonight), but my homemade scripts used c902c9a6 (from dec 21)
> I'm interested if it is before > or after Robert Fitzsimons patches which replaced 101 forks in > log-like views with 1 fork, which I think affects gitweb performance > a lot.
ab is after the patches, my homemade scripts was before
> The page which is optimized is summary view, if you use projects_list > and not projectroot directory...
I tested 'a=shortlog', since it seems to be functionally equivalent to cgits log view.
-- larsh