From: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:44:44 GMT
Subject: Re: cgit vs. gitweb
Message-ID: <8c5c35580612251644u26fde33aoe23d331c9192f8e7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200612260132.41062.jnareb@gmail.com>

On 12/26/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, which version of gitweb did you use (shortened sha1 of
> commit, or result of git-describe)?

Results from ab used gitweb/1.4.4.3.gd4ada (pulled tonight), but my
homemade scripts used c902c9a6 (from dec 21)

> I'm interested if it is before
> or after Robert Fitzsimons patches which replaced 101 forks in
> log-like views with 1 fork, which I think affects gitweb performance
> a lot.

ab is after the patches, my homemade scripts was before

> The page which is optimized is summary view, if you use projects_list
> and not projectroot directory...

I tested 'a=shortlog', since it seems to be functionally equivalent to
cgits log view.

-- 
larsh