Re: bare --init Vs --init bare
- From
- Santi Béjar <sbejar@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 19, 2008, 19:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8aa486160805191232m76bbc7detdcd2d459c8e572cd@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080519175313.GA17305@bit.office.eurotux.com>
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com> wrote:
> > Hello, >
Show 5 quoted lines
> This is odd: > $ git init --bare > usage: git-init [-q | --quiet] [--template=<template-directory>] [--shared] > $ git --bare init > Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/1/
The first is a flag to the init subcommand (man git-init), and the other is a flag to git (man git).
See also:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22git+init+--bare%22+%22git+--bare+init%22
or equivalent
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2007/10/15/344050 "should git command and git-command be equivalent?"
Santi
Show 16 quoted lines
> > My git version: > $ git --version > git version 1.5.5.1.318.gc99b > > (Has two patches on top of origin's > 377d9c409ffe0f0d994b929aeb94716139207b9d, setting default prefix in > Makefile.) > > Regards, > Luciano Rocha > > -- > Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com> > Eurotux Informática, S.A. <http://www.eurotux.com/> >