Re: git bug? + question
- From
- Santi Béjar <sbejar@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2006, 10:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8aa486160611030227w4c79ace9ta00a3eecfc46b11a@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061103095905.GD7545@admingilde.org>
On 11/3/06, Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org> wrote:
> I think the most intuitive thing for pull would be to fetch into > remotes/<remotename>/* and then to merge > remotes/<remotename>/<currentbranch>.
Yes as the default branch to merge instead the first line, the problem is that it changes the current behaviour. But I think the most intuitive thing would be to record the branch it is based off at the branch creation time. Something similar to my patch:
Oct 17 [PATCHv2] git-branch: Set branch properties Message-ID: <87y7rf80es.fsf@gmail.com>
Note that it is for the "old" git-branch.sh.