From: Santi Béjar <sbejar@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 10:27:36 GMT
Subject: Re: git bug? + question
Message-ID: <8aa486160611030227w4c79ace9ta00a3eecfc46b11a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061103095905.GD7545@admingilde.org>

On 11/3/06, Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org> wrote:
> I think the most intuitive thing for pull would be to fetch into
> remotes/<remotename>/* and then to merge
> remotes/<remotename>/<currentbranch>.

Yes as the default branch to merge instead the first line, the problem
is that it changes the current behaviour. But I think the most
intuitive thing would be to record the branch it is based off at the
branch creation time. Something similar to my patch:

Oct 17 [PATCHv2] git-branch: Set branch properties
Message-ID: <87y7rf80es.fsf@gmail.com>

Note that it is for the "old" git-branch.sh.