Re: Git user survey and `git pull`
- From
- Santi <sbejar@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 22, 2006, 10:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8aa486160609220334w39a7d455s66f815f00ef6b6f6@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vu0305wh8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
2006/9/22, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>:
Show 14 quoted lines
> I am actually in favor of adding config mechanism that lets you > say things like: > > When on branch 'foo': > > - pull without any argument shall use .git/remotes/$that, > instead of the usual .git/remotes/origin; > > - pull without pathspec arguments shall use the named > .git/remotes/ file to learn from which URL to fetch from, > which remote branches to fetch and which local branches to > store them, but merge $this_and_that remote heads regardless > of what .git/remotes/ file says; >
Something like http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git&m=115398815111209&w=2 ?
Santi