From: Santi <sbejar@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:34:43 GMT
Subject: Re: Git user survey and `git pull`
Message-ID: <8aa486160609220334w39a7d455s66f815f00ef6b6f6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vu0305wh8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

2006/9/22, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>:
> I am actually in favor of adding config mechanism that lets you
> say things like:
>
>   When on branch 'foo':
>
>   - pull without any argument shall use .git/remotes/$that,
>     instead of the usual .git/remotes/origin;
>
>   - pull without pathspec arguments shall use the named
>     .git/remotes/ file to learn from which URL to fetch from,
>     which remote branches to fetch and which local branches to
>     store them, but merge $this_and_that remote heads regardless
>     of what .git/remotes/ file says;
>

Something like
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git&m=115398815111209&w=2
?

  Santi