Re: [PATCH 2/2] orphan/unborn: fix use of 'orphan' in end-user facing messages
- From
Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 20, 2023, 21:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8a3b5a71-0207-4129-87b3-e4e3eb7c797b@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqa5q4skwg.fsf@gitster.g>
On 20-dic-2023 12:01:51, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> The two-patch series, whose second part is the message I am > responding to, did not see much reaction, but since it came > during an end-user puzzlement and was written to make the docs less > puzzling, I am tempted to merge it down to 'next'. > > Thanks. >
If you need some positive feedback; I've read your series and it looks good to me and going in a good direction.
I think "unborn branch" is a more accurate term than "orphaned branch". It's not perfect, but I don't have a better one to offer.
A nit in 1/2, which of course is not worth a re-roll, is a double blank line near the end; which I suspect is unintentional.
Just in case anyone else is looking for the thread where the puzzlement was reported:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/FE2AD666-88DE-4F70-8D6D-3A426689EB41@me.com/
Thank you.