From: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 21:21:58 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] orphan/unborn: fix use of 'orphan' in end-user facing messages
Message-ID: <8a3b5a71-0207-4129-87b3-e4e3eb7c797b@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa5q4skwg.fsf@gitster.g>

On 20-dic-2023 12:01:51, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> The two-patch series, whose second part is the message I am
> responding to, did not see much reaction, but since it came
> during an end-user puzzlement and was written to make the docs less
> puzzling, I am tempted to merge it down to 'next'.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

If you need some positive feedback;  I've read your series and it looks
good to me and going in a good direction.

I think "unborn branch" is a more accurate term than "orphaned branch".
It's not perfect, but I don't have a better one to offer.

A nit in 1/2, which of course is not worth a re-roll, is a double blank
line near the end;  which I suspect is unintentional.

Just in case anyone else is looking for the thread where the puzzlement
was reported:

https://lore.kernel.org/git/FE2AD666-88DE-4F70-8D6D-3A426689EB41@me.com/

Thank you.