Re: [RFC PATCH] Rename "bury" back to "sink".
- From
David Kågedal <davidk@lysator.liu.se>
- Date
- May 13, 2007, 18:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87zm48wpbs.fsf@morpheus.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070505201307.GE19253@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net>
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Side note about the "stg move" name: yes it could possible to mistake it > for "move file" (especially as we don't have "stg mv"). My current > state of mind would be to drop add/rm/cp from stgit, and move the "stg > cp" logic to a new git-cp command. This way, stgit would just be > about handling series of patches, with git being used for the > working-copy. Any opinions on this ?
For this reason, and others, I think "stg reorder" would be better. Especially if you implement Karl's suggestion of reordering all patches in an editor.
-- David Kågedal