From: David Kågedal <davidk@lysator.liu.se>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 18:28:23 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Rename "bury" back to "sink".
Message-ID: <87zm48wpbs.fsf@morpheus.local>
In-Reply-To: <20070505201307.GE19253@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net>

Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> writes:

> Side note about the "stg move" name: yes it could possible to mistake it
> for "move file" (especially as we don't have "stg mv").  My current
> state of mind would be to drop add/rm/cp from stgit, and move the "stg
> cp" logic to a new git-cp command.  This way, stgit would just be
> about handling series of patches, with git being used for the
> working-copy.  Any opinions on this ?

For this reason, and others, I think "stg reorder" would be better.
Especially if you implement Karl's suggestion of reordering all
patches in an editor.

-- 
David Kågedal