git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: bare vs non-bare <1.7 then >=1.7 ?

From
Carlos Martin Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Date
Nov 8, 2012, 13:26 UTC
Message-ID
<87zk2sz0mn.fsf@flaca.cmartin.tk>
In-Reply-To
<509B8552.4080303@rktmb.org>
Mihamina Rakotomandimby <mihamina@rktmb.org> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Hi all,
>
> We're on the way to have our first project using Git.
> We're currently mostly using Hg (90%) & SVN (10%).
>
> When experimenting in order to train some colleagues, I saw that If I
> clone a repository, I couldn't push to it because it was a non-bare
> one.
> Searchin for some explanations, I found this ressource:
> http://www.bitflop.com/document/111
>
> It's told to be reliable information for Git < v1.7.
>
> What would be different for Git > 1.7 so that I could be up to date
> with the facts?

Bare vs. non-bare hasn't changed. The reasoning behind the two types hasn't changed and is pretty fundamental. There is no reason for it to change.

   cmn
Previous: Mihamina RakotomandimbyNext: Jeff King
Message 2 of 5 in “bare vs non-bare <1.7 then >=1.7 ?”
  1. Mihamina RakotomandimbyNov 8, 2012
  2. Carlos Martin NietoNov 8, 2012
  3. Jeff KingNov 8, 2012
  4. Enrico WeigeltNov 10, 2012
  5. Philip OakleyNov 10, 2012

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.