From: Carlos Martin Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:26:40 GMT
Subject: Re: bare vs non-bare <1.7 then >=1.7 ?
Message-ID: <87zk2sz0mn.fsf@flaca.cmartin.tk>
In-Reply-To: <509B8552.4080303@rktmb.org>

Mihamina Rakotomandimby <mihamina@rktmb.org> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> We're on the way to have our first project using Git.
> We're currently mostly using Hg (90%) & SVN (10%).
>
> When experimenting in order to train some colleagues, I saw that If I
> clone a repository, I couldn't push to it because it was a non-bare
> one.
> Searchin for some explanations, I found this ressource:
> http://www.bitflop.com/document/111
>
> It's told to be reliable information for Git < v1.7.
>
> What would be different for Git > 1.7 so that I could be up to date
> with the facts?

Bare vs. non-bare hasn't changed. The reasoning behind the two types
hasn't changed and is pretty fundamental. There is no reason for it to
change.

   cmn