Re: patch-2.7.3 no longer applies relative symbolic link patches
- From
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
- Date
- Jan 26, 2015, 21:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87twzdl0iw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CA+55aFxbY21vBbPs5qCFPT1HSBbaeS+Z2Fr9So1r3rXrMWe_ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
Show 26 quoted lines
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> I went to do the Fedora 3.19-rc6 build this morning and it failed in >> our buildsystem with: >> >> + '[' '!' -f /builddir/build/SOURCES/patch-3.19-rc6.xz ']' >> + case "$patch" in >> + unxz >> + patch -p1 -F1 -s >> symbolic link target '../../../../../include/dt-bindings' is invalid >> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mWE3ZL (%prep) > > Ugh. I don't see anything we can do about this on the git side, and I > do kind of understand why 'patch' would be worried about '..' files. > In a perfect world, patch would parse the filename and see that it > stays within the directory structure of the project, but that is a > rather harder thing to do than just say "no dot-dot files". > > The short-term fix is likely to just use "git apply" instead of "patch". > > The long-term fix? I dunno. I don't see us not using symlinks, and a > quick check says that every *single* symlink we have in the kernel > source tree is one that points to a different directory using ".." > format. And while I could imagine that "patch" ends up counting the > dot-dot entries and checking that it's all inside the same tree it is > patching, I could also easily see patch *not* doing that.
I consider it rather hard and error-prone and/or an attack vector to choose a course of action for ../ in connection with the -p option.
-- David Kastrup