Re: [PATCH] Do not ignore merge options in interactive rebase
- From
- Arnaud Fontaine <arnau@debian.org>
- Date
- Jul 2, 2013, 08:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87sizx2xqe.fsf@duckcorp.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v61x22av9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hello,
Sorry for the late reply.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 67 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> You should use ${var:+if_set_to_nonempty_use_this} here.
>> ...
>> So munging it manually with sloppy "sed" script is simply wrong.
>
> Perhaps something like this on top of your patch squashed in?
>
> The eval magic lets the shell to split $strategy_opts back into
> individual words (e.g. "--subtree=My Project" is a single word), strip
> the leading "--", and then uses "rev-parse --sq-quote" again to turn
> them into "-X 'subtree=My Project'" (two words), which can be inserted
> into a string later to be eval'ed.
>
> git-rebase--interactive.sh | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> index e558397..ae2da7a 100644
> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> @@ -83,8 +83,13 @@ rewritten_pending="$state_dir"/rewritten-pending
> strategy_args=
> if test -n "$do_merge"
> then
> - strategy_args="${strategy+--strategy=$strategy}
> - $(echo $strategy_opts | sed "s/'--\([^']*\)'/-X\1/g")"
> + strategy_args=${strategy:+--strategy=$strategy}
> + eval '
> + for strategy_opt in '"$strategy_opts"'
> + do
> + strategy_args="$strategy_args -X$(git rev-parse --sq-quote "${strategy_opt#--}")"
> + done
> + '
> fi
>
> GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP="$resolvemsg"
> @@ -246,7 +251,7 @@ pick_one () {
>
> test -d "$rewritten" &&
> pick_one_preserving_merges "$@" && return
> - output git cherry-pick $strategy_args $empty_args $ff "$@"
> + output eval git cherry-pick "$strategy_args" $empty_args $ff "$@"
> }
>
> pick_one_preserving_merges () {
> @@ -347,9 +352,8 @@ pick_one_preserving_merges () {
> msg_content="$(commit_message $sha1)"
> # No point in merging the first parent, that's HEAD
> new_parents=${new_parents# $first_parent}
> - if ! do_with_author output \
> - git merge --no-ff $strategy_args -m \
> - "$msg_content" $new_parents
> + if ! do_with_author output eval \
> + 'git merge --no-ff $strategy_args -m "$msg_content" $new_parents'
> then
> printf "%s\n" "$msg_content" > "$GIT_DIR"/MERGE_MSG
> die_with_patch $sha1 "Error redoing merge $sha1"
> @@ -357,7 +361,7 @@ pick_one_preserving_merges () {
> echo "$sha1 $(git rev-parse HEAD^0)" >> "$rewritten_list"
> ;;
> *)
> - output git cherry-pick $strategy_args "$@" ||
> + output eval git cherry-pick "$strategy_args" "$@" ||
> die_with_patch $sha1 "Could not pick $sha1"
> ;;
> esacIndeed, this is much better this way. Thank you very much! I have just squashed your patch into mine and ran successfully t3404 and t3421 tests after rebasing my branch on top of current master.
I will send the final patch in another email. Of course, feel free to take authorship of the patch or add yourself as Signed-off-by.
Cheers,
-- Arnaud Fontaine