git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH] Do not ignore merge options in interactive rebase

From
AFArnaud Fontaine <arnau@debian.org>
Date
Jun 24, 2013, 07:47 UTC
Message-ID
<87ppvcx84r.fsf@duckcorp.org>
In-Reply-To
<87bo6wyn0z.fsf@duckcorp.org>

Fix inconsistency where `--strategy` and/or `--strategy-option` can be specified in git rebase, but with `--interactive` argument only there were completely ignored.

Signed-off-by: Arnaud Fontaine <arnau@debian.org>
---
 git-rebase--interactive.sh    | 13 ++++++++++---
 t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
index f953d8d..e558397 100644
--- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
+++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
@@ -80,6 +80,13 @@ amend="$state_dir"/amend
 rewritten_list="$state_dir"/rewritten-list
 rewritten_pending="$state_dir"/rewritten-pending
 
+strategy_args=
+if test -n "$do_merge"
+then
+	strategy_args="${strategy+--strategy=$strategy}
+ $(echo $strategy_opts | sed "s/'--\([^']*\)'/-X\1/g")"
+fi
+
 GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP="$resolvemsg"
 export GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP
 
@@ -239,7 +246,7 @@ pick_one () {
 
 	test -d "$rewritten" &&
 		pick_one_preserving_merges "$@" && return
-	output git cherry-pick $empty_args $ff "$@"
+	output git cherry-pick $strategy_args $empty_args $ff "$@"
 }
 
 pick_one_preserving_merges () {
@@ -341,7 +348,7 @@ pick_one_preserving_merges () {
 			# No point in merging the first parent, that's HEAD
 			new_parents=${new_parents# $first_parent}
 			if ! do_with_author output \
-				git merge --no-ff ${strategy:+-s $strategy} -m \
+				git merge --no-ff $strategy_args -m \
 					"$msg_content" $new_parents
 			then
 				printf "%s\n" "$msg_content" > "$GIT_DIR"/MERGE_MSG
@@ -350,7 +357,7 @@ pick_one_preserving_merges () {
 			echo "$sha1 $(git rev-parse HEAD^0)" >> "$rewritten_list"
 			;;
 		*)
-			output git cherry-pick "$@" ||
+			output git cherry-pick $strategy_args "$@" ||
 				die_with_patch $sha1 "Could not pick $sha1"
 			;;
 		esac
diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
index 79e8d3c..8b6a36f 100755
--- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
+++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
@@ -947,4 +947,15 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase -i respects core.commentchar' '
 	test B = $(git cat-file commit HEAD^ | sed -ne \$p)
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'rebase -i with --strategy and -X' '
+	git checkout -b conflict-merge-use-theirs conflict-branch &&
+	git reset --hard HEAD^ &&
+	echo five >conflict &&
+	echo Z >file1 &&
+	git commit -a -m "one file conflict" &&
+	EDITOR=true git rebase -i --strategy=recursive -Xours conflict-branch &&
+	test $(git show conflict-branch:conflict) = $(cat conflict) &&
+	test $(cat file1) = Z
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
1.8.3.GIT
Previous: Arnaud FontaineNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 4 of 9 in “Do not ignore merge options in interactive rebase”
  1. Do not ignore merge options in interactive rebaseArnaud Fontaine, Jun 21, 2013
  2. Junio C HamanoJun 21, 2013
  3. Arnaud FontaineJun 24, 2013
  4. Do not ignore merge options in interactive rebaseArnaud Fontaine, Jun 24, 2013
  5. Junio C HamanoJun 25, 2013
  6. Junio C HamanoJun 25, 2013
  7. Arnaud FontaineJul 2, 2013
  8. Do not ignore merge options in interactive rebaseArnaud Fontaine, Jul 2, 2013
  9. Junio C HamanoJun 24, 2013

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.