git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] status: add a failing test showing a core.untrackedCache bug

From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date
Dec 27, 2017, 18:50 UTC
Message-ID
<87mv24qa2y.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<xmqqlghoniuk.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Dec 27 2017, Junio C. Hamano jotted:
Show 20 quoted lines
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> +status_is_clean() {
>> +	>../status.expect &&
>> +	git status --porcelain >../status.actual &&
>> +	test_cmp ../status.expect ../status.actual
>> +}
>> +
>>  test_lazy_prereq UNTRACKED_CACHE '
>>  	{ git update-index --test-untracked-cache; ret=$?; } &&
>>  	test $ret -ne 1
>> @@ -683,4 +689,43 @@ test_expect_success 'untracked cache survives a commit' '
>>  	test_cmp ../before ../after
>>  '
>>
>> +test_expect_success 'teardown worktree' '
>> +    cd ..
>> +'
>
> Funny indentation.

Thanks. I'll submit a new series with all 3 patches with the issues you brought up mentioned...

Show 18 quoted lines
>> +test_expect_success 'setup worktree for symlink test' '
>> +	git init worktree-symlink &&
>> +	cd worktree-symlink &&
>> +	git config core.untrackedCache true &&
>> +	mkdir one two &&
>> +	touch one/file two/file &&
>> +	git add one/file two/file &&
>> +	git commit -m"first commit" &&
>> +	git rm -rf one &&
>> +	ln -s two one &&
>> +	git add one &&
>> +	git commit -m"second commit"
>> +'
>
> This needs SYMLINKS prereq, which in turn means it cannot be tested
> on certain platforms.  I thought Duy's answer was that this does not
> need to involve a symbolic link at all?  If so, perhaps we can have
> another test that does not need symlink?

... as soon as I figure out how to add such a non-symlink test as well (seems sensible to test both), but I can't bring it to fail without symlinks, I just adjusted my test script to do this instead:

    (
        rm -rf /tmp/testrepo &&
        git init /tmp/testrepo &&
        cd /tmp/testrepo &&
        mkdir x y &&
        touch x/a y/b &&
        git add x/a y/b &&
        git commit -msnap &&
        git rm -rf y &&
        mkdir y &&
        touch y/c &&
        git add y &&
        git commit -msnap2 &&
        git checkout HEAD~ &&
        git status &&
        git checkout master &&
        sleep 1 &&
        git status &&
        git status
    )
Duy, what am I missing here?
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Duy Nguyen
Message 10 of 12 in “status: add a failing test showing a core.untrackedCache bug”
  1. status: add a failing test showing a core.untrackedCache bugÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Dec 22, 2017
  2. Duy NguyenDec 25, 2017
  3. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonDec 25, 2017
  4. Duy NguyenDec 26, 2017
  5. Duy NguyenDec 27, 2017
  6. 3/1 update-index doc: note a fixed bug in the untracked cacheÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Dec 27, 2017
  7. Junio C HamanoDec 27, 2017
  8. Eric SunshineDec 27, 2017
  9. Junio C HamanoDec 27, 2017
  10. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonDec 27, 2017
  11. Duy NguyenDec 28, 2017
  12. Junio C HamanoDec 28, 2017

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.