git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

How to undo previously set configuration? (again)

From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date
Apr 25, 2019, 10:08 UTC
Message-ID
<87k1fis8gq.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20190424230744.GL6316@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
On Thu, Apr 25 2019, brian m. carlson wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 07:34:38PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> brian m. carlson wrote:
>>
>> > I've talked with some people about this approach, and they've indicated
>> > they would prefer a configuration-based approach.
>>
>> I would, too, mostly because that reduces the problem of securing
>> hooks to securing configuration.  See
>> https://public-inbox.org/git/20171002234517.GV19555@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com/
>> for more on this subject.
>
> I know this is a common issue, but fixing it is a non-goal for this
> series. Anything we do here is going to have to be backwards compatible,
> so we can't make any changes to the security model.

Agreed on the problem, and on the non-goal for solving it as part of this series.

Show 25 quoted lines
>> Solving (1) without (2) feels like a bit of a missed opportunity to
>> me.  Ideally, what I would like is
>>
>>    i. A central registry of trustworthy Git hooks that can be upgraded
>>       using the system package manager to address (2).  Perhaps just
>>       git-hook-* commands on the $PATH.
>>
>>   ii. Instead of putting hooks in .git/hooks, put a list of hooks to
>>       run for each event in .git/config.
>
> The problem I had with this when discussing it was that our
> configuration system lacks a good way to control inheritance from outer
> files. I recently was working with a system-wide gitconfig file that
> referred to files I didn't have, and my Git installation was subtly
> broken in a variety of ways.
>
> If I have a system-wide hook to run for company code, but I have a
> checkout for my personal dotfiles on my machine where I don't want to
> run that hook, our configuration lacks a way for me to disable that
> system-wide configuration. However, using our current system, I can
> override core.hooksPath in this case and everything works fine.
>
> I mentioned this for completeness, and because I hope that some of those
> people will get some time to chime in here, but I think without that
> feature, we end up with a worse experience than we have now.

I sent a proposal for this last year "How to undo previously set configuration?": https://public-inbox.org/git/874lkq11ug.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/

Obviously the main bottleneck is someone like me working on patching it, but in this case it would be very useful if those who are interested in this could look that proposal over and bikeshed it / point out issues I may have missed, i.e. "no, this categorically won't work with this proposed syntax due to XYZ you haven't thought of...".

Because we don't have some general config facility for this it keeps coming up, and various existing/proposed options have their own little custom hacks for doing it, e.g. this for Barret Rhoden's proposed "blame skip commits" feature https://public-inbox.org/git/878swhfzxb.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ (b.t.w. I *meant* /dev/null in that E-Mail, but due to PEBCAK wrote /dev/zero).

Previous: Jonathan NiederNext: Duy Nguyen
Message 28 of 51 in “Multiple hook support”
  1. 0/5 Multiple hook supportbrian m. carlson, Apr 24, 2019
  2. 1/5 run-command: add preliminary support for multiple hooksbrian m. carlson, Apr 24, 2019
  3. Junio C HamanoApr 24, 2019
  4. Johannes SixtApr 24, 2019
  5. Junio C HamanoApr 25, 2019
  6. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonApr 25, 2019
  7. Junio C HamanoApr 25, 2019
  8. Johannes SixtApr 25, 2019
  9. brian m. carlsonApr 26, 2019
  10. Johannes SixtApr 26, 2019
  11. brian m. carlsonApr 24, 2019
  12. 2/5 builtin/receive-pack: add support for multiple hooksbrian m. carlson, Apr 24, 2019
  13. 3/5 sequencer: add support for multiple hooksbrian m. carlson, Apr 24, 2019
  14. Phillip WoodApr 24, 2019
  15. brian m. carlsonApr 24, 2019
  16. Phillip WoodApr 25, 2019
  17. 5/5 transport: add support for multiple pre-push hooksbrian m. carlson, Apr 24, 2019
  18. 4/5 builtin/worktree: add support for multiple post-checkout hooksbrian m. carlson, Apr 24, 2019
  19. Junio C HamanoApr 24, 2019
  20. brian m. carlsonApr 24, 2019
  21. Junio C HamanoApr 24, 2019
  22. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonApr 24, 2019
  23. Jonathan NiederApr 24, 2019
  24. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonApr 24, 2019
  25. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonApr 24, 2019
  26. brian m. carlsonApr 24, 2019
  27. Jonathan NiederApr 24, 2019
  28. How to undo previously set configuration? (again)Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Apr 25, 2019
  29. Duy NguyenApr 25, 2019
  30. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonApr 25, 2019
  31. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonApr 26, 2019
  32. Jonathan NiederApr 25, 2019
  33. Barret RhodenApr 25, 2019
  34. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonApr 25, 2019
  35. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonApr 25, 2019
  36. Junio C HamanoApr 26, 2019
  37. Duy NguyenApr 26, 2019
  38. Jeff KingApr 30, 2019
  39. Duy NguyenMay 1, 2019
  40. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonMay 1, 2019
  41. Duy NguyenMay 1, 2019
  42. Jeff KingMay 1, 2019
  43. Jeff KingMay 1, 2019
  44. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonApr 24, 2019
  45. Phillip WoodApr 24, 2019
  46. Bryan TurnerApr 24, 2019
  47. Duy NguyenApr 24, 2019
  48. brian m. carlsonApr 24, 2019
  49. brian m. carlsonApr 24, 2019
  50. Duy NguyenApr 25, 2019
  51. Jeff KingApr 30, 2019

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.