Re: kha/safe and kha/experimental updated

> On 18/12/2007, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Thanks again for maintaining these branches.
>> >
>> > On 18/12/2007, Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> wrote:
>> > >   git://repo.or.cz/stgit/kha.git safe
>>
>> > >       Remove "stg resolved"
>> >
>> > I'd like to keep this command. git-mergetool doesn't support the tool
>> > I use (emacs + ediff and more stgit-specific file extensions like
>> > current, patch etc.). I also don't find 'git add' to be meaningful for
>> > marking a conflict as solved.
>>
>> I also would like to have this command kept (and shown in 'stg help'!).
>> Contrary to 'git add' it can check and add to index / update index
>> only for files with conflict; we have -r (ancestor|current|patched)
>> to choose one side, and we could add --check to check if there are
>> no conflict markers with files (useful with -a/--all).
>
> I'd also like to re-add the stgit.keeporig option and additional
> functionality so that the *.{ancestor,current,patched} can be left in
> the working tree. Some people might use them when manually fixing
> conflicts (I have a look at them from time to time when the emacs +
> ediff shows a hard to understand conflict).