Re: git log for only certain branches
- From
Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
- Date
- Apr 8, 2014, 17:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87bnwb4u5u.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAHd499BSgxZ8EC1qKYRsF0hac6rQAegw9qTOoDjaiuh_UUVEng@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 08 2014, Robert Dailey wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> I have more details about my inquiry on StackOverflow: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22823768/view-git-log-with-merges-for-only-certain-branches > > Basically I'd like to know if it is possible to show the graph for > ONLY branches that I list. The key here is that the graph should also > show relationships between only those branches that I list. In other > words, any ancestors that I do not explicitly specify should not be > rendered in the graph.
What about using ^<branch> notation to exclude certain branches? See for example SPECIFYING RANGES in git-rev-parse(1).
-Michal