From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 17:18:05 GMT
Subject: Re: git log for only certain branches
Message-ID: <87bnwb4u5u.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
In-Reply-To: <CAHd499BSgxZ8EC1qKYRsF0hac6rQAegw9qTOoDjaiuh_UUVEng@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 08 2014, Robert Dailey wrote:
> I have more details about my inquiry on StackOverflow:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22823768/view-git-log-with-merges-for-only-certain-branches
>
> Basically I'd like to know if it is possible to show the graph for
> ONLY branches that I list. The key here is that the graph should also
> show relationships between only those branches that I list. In other
> words, any ancestors that I do not explicitly specify should not be
> rendered in the graph.

What about using ^<branch> notation to exclude certain branches? See for
example SPECIFYING RANGES in git-rev-parse(1).

-Michal