Re: [PATCH v5] gitweb: redacted e-mail addresses feature.

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> writes:
>> > As a data point, none of the homograph@ candidates I posted here
>> > on Mar 29 have attracted any attempts on my mail server.
>> 
>> That is an interesting observation.  All homograph@ non-addresses,
>> if a human corrected the funnies in their spelling, would have hit
>> whoever handles @80x24.org mailboxes.
>> 
>> I take it to mean that as a future direction, replacing <redacted>
>> with the obfuscated-but-readable-by-humans homographs is a likely
>> improvement that would help human users while still inconveniencing
>> the crawlers.  It may however need some provision to prevent casual
>> end-users from cutting-and-pasting these homographs, as you said in
>> your original mention of the homograph approach.
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
>> But other than that, does the patch look reasonable?
>
> I only took a cursory glance at it, but v6 seemed fine.