Re: [PATCH v5] gitweb: redacted e-mail addresses feature.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> writes:
> > As a data point, none of the homograph@ candidates I posted here
> > on Mar 29 have attracted any attempts on my mail server.
>
> That is an interesting observation. All homograph@ non-addresses,
> if a human corrected the funnies in their spelling, would have hit
> whoever handles @80x24.org mailboxes.
>
> I take it to mean that as a future direction, replacing <redacted>
> with the obfuscated-but-readable-by-humans homographs is a likely
> improvement that would help human users while still inconveniencing
> the crawlers. It may however need some provision to prevent casual
> end-users from cutting-and-pasting these homographs, as you said in
> your original mention of the homograph approach.
> But other than that, does the patch look reasonable?
I only took a cursory glance at it, but v6 seemed fine.