Re: Linus' sha1 is much faster!
- From
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivano@gnu.org>
- Date
- Aug 16, 2009, 22:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87ab1ze76y.fsf@master.homenet>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908161306340.3162@localhost.localdomain>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I pretty much can guarantee you that it improves things only because it > makes gcc generate crap code, which then hides some of the P4 issues. > > I'd also suggest you try gcc-4.4, since that apparently fixes some of the > oddest spill issues.
Thanks for the hint. I tried gcc-4.4 and it produces slower code than 4.3 on the gnulib SHA1 implementation and my patch makes it even more!
I noticed that on my machine your implementation is ~30-40% faster using SHA_ROT for rol/ror instructions than inline assembly, at least with the test-case Pádraig wrote. Am I the only one reporting it?
Cheers, Giuseppe