Re: 'git branch' when origin branch with same name exists
- From
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
- Date
- Jun 19, 2012, 17:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87a9zztdxt.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch>
- In-Reply-To
- <4FE091FB.7020202@desrt.ca>
Ryan Lortie <desrt@desrt.ca> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> In this case, the user wanted to checkout a branch of a module. They did: > > git clone git://git.gnome.org/gtk+ > cd gtk+ > git branch gtk-3-4 > > Obviously this is a user error, but it's a pretty innocent one, and > puts the user in a bad state. When they figure they should have typed > "git checkout gtk-3-4" it is already too late -- they will be taken > onto their locally-created copy of the master branch. > > So feature request: 'git branch' should not allow creating a local > branch that has the same name as a branch that already exists on > origin' (or any remote?) without some sort of --force flag.
How does this fit with the fact that git has forever(?) created a 'master' branch when cloning, and usually points it at origin/master too?
I honestly haven't decided whether I should like or hate your proposal, but ISTM that outlawing an operation that git does on every clone is a bit moot.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch