git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: 'git branch' when origin branch with same name exists

From
KKKonstantin Khomoutov <flatworm@users.sourceforge.net>
Date
Jun 19, 2012, 16:06 UTC
Message-ID
<20120619200648.2cc8a861.kostix@domain007.com>
In-Reply-To
<4FE091FB.7020202@desrt.ca>

On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:51:39 -0400 Ryan Lortie <desrt@desrt.ca> wrote:

Show 15 quoted lines
> After helping someone on IRC who got themselves into a bit of a
> problem, I have a feature request for git.
> 
> In this case, the user wanted to checkout a branch of a module.  They
> did:
> 
>    git clone git://git.gnome.org/gtk+
>    cd gtk+
>    git branch gtk-3-4
> 
> Obviously this is a user error, but it's a pretty innocent one, and
> puts the user in a bad state.
> When they figure they should have
> typed "git checkout gtk-3-4" it is already too late -- they will be
> taken onto their locally-created copy of the master branch.

How bad this state really is? The user is free to do $ git branch -m gtk-3-4 mygtk-3-4 at any time after the error was detected.

> So feature request: 'git branch' should not allow creating a local 
> branch that has the same name as a branch that already exists on 
> 'origin' (or any remote?) without some sort of --force flag.  It
> could instead helpfully say:
[...]
> or something like that.

This would not protect from the obvious case when a branch has been created on the remote (by someone else) but has not been fetched yet and so the local repo does not know a branch with "conflicting" name do exist.

> Thoughts?

Your intention is good but I think a safety net of the kind you propose would be slightly over the top. Basically you're trying to compensate for the user error who thinks the "branch" command should take her to an already existing branch while it does something completely different. Hence preventing the `git branch gtk-3-4` command from completion should there be a remote-tracking branch of the same name is just wrong IMO. On the other hand, posting a hint might be OK. I'm talking about something like this:

$ git branch gtk-3-4 The remote "origin" has the branch of the same name. The created branch is not set to track it.

Such a hint would state the obvious thing but it would alert a user who would not expect it (and hopefully make her google or ask for assistance using this hint's message).

Anyway, this will make each call to git-branch to perform a crawl over the refs/heads hierarchy which, I think, is not worth the result.

Previous: Angus HammondNext: Ryan Lortie
Message 7 of 19 in “'git branch' when origin branch with same name exists”
  1. Ryan LortieJun 19, 2012
  2. jaseem abidJun 19, 2012
  3. Michael SchubertJun 19, 2012
  4. Ryan LortieJun 19, 2012
  5. Philippe VaucherJun 19, 2012
  6. Angus HammondJun 19, 2012
  7. Konstantin KhomoutovJun 19, 2012
  8. Ryan LortieJun 19, 2012
  9. Andreas EricssonJun 20, 2012
  10. Thomas RastJun 19, 2012
  11. Junio C HamanoJun 19, 2012
  12. Ryan LortieJun 19, 2012
  13. Junio C HamanoJun 19, 2012
  14. Ryan LortieJun 19, 2012
  15. Phil HordJun 19, 2012
  16. Junio C HamanoJun 20, 2012
  17. Matthieu MoyJun 20, 2012
  18. Junio C HamanoJun 20, 2012
  19. Junio C HamanoJun 19, 2012

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.