Re: size_t vs "unsigned long"
- From
- Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Date
- Oct 3, 2007, 21:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <877im3khj0.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071003204801.GC28188@artemis.corp>
* Pierre Habouzit:
> Well, afaict, on every linux archs I know of, unsigned longs and > size_t are the same.
IIRC, 64-bit Windows uses 64-bit points (duh) and hence a 64-bit size_t, but still has got 32-bit longs. Documentation is a bit sparse on this matter (because you are supposed to use LONG, DWORD and friends anyway).