From: Florian Weimer Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:36:03 GMT Subject: Re: size_t vs "unsigned long" Message-ID: <877im3khj0.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> In-Reply-To: <20071003204801.GC28188@artemis.corp> * Pierre Habouzit: > Well, afaict, on every linux archs I know of, unsigned longs and > size_t are the same. IIRC, 64-bit Windows uses 64-bit points (duh) and hence a 64-bit size_t, but still has got 32-bit longs. Documentation is a bit sparse on this matter (because you are supposed to use LONG, DWORD and friends anyway).