Re: [PATCH] upload-pack: disable commit graph more gently for shallow traversal
- From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 12, 2019, 19:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <875aea73-eebd-fd8a-4d4b-c3b9df027a04@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190912142306.GE23031@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On 9/12/2019 10:23 AM, Jeff King wrote:
Show 75 quoted lines
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 08:23:49AM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote: > >>> That creates an interesting problem for commits that have _already_ been >>> parsed using the commit graph. Their commit->object.parsed flag is set, >>> their commit->graph_pos is set, but their commit->maybe_tree may still >>> be NULL. When somebody later calls repo_get_commit_tree(), we see that >>> we haven't loaded the tree oid yet and try to get it from the commit >>> graph. But since it has been freed, we segfault! >> >> OOPS! That is certainly a bad thing. I'm glad you found it, but I >> am sorry for how you (probably) found it. > > Heh. I'll admit it was quite a slog of debugging, but _most_ of that was > figuring out in which circumstance we'd have actually parsed the object. > Finding the problematic end state was pretty easy from a coredump. :) > >>> diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c >>> index 9b02d2c426..bc5dd5913f 100644 >>> --- a/commit-graph.c >>> +++ b/commit-graph.c >>> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ >>> #define GRAPH_MIN_SIZE (GRAPH_HEADER_SIZE + 4 * GRAPH_CHUNKLOOKUP_WIDTH \ >>> + GRAPH_FANOUT_SIZE + the_hash_algo->rawsz) >>> >>> +static int commit_graph_disabled; >> >> Should we be putting this inside the repository struct instead? > > Probably. The only caller will just pass the_repository, but it doesn't > hurt to scope it down now. > > It could potentially go into the commit_graph itself, but it looks like > with the incremental work we may have multiple such structs. It could > also go into raw_object_store, but I think conceptually it's a > repo-level thing. > > So I put it straight into "struct repository". > >> Your patch does not seem to actually cover the "I've already parsed some commits" >> case, as you are only preventing the commit-graph from being prepared. Instead, >> we need to have a short-circuit inside parse_commit() to avoid future parsing >> from the commit-graph file. > > Maybe I was too clever, then. :) > > I didn't want to have to sprinkle "are we disabled" in parse_commit(), > etc. But any such uses of the commit graph have to do: > > if (!prepare_commit_graph(r)) > return; > > to lazy-load it. So the logic to prepare becomes (roughly): > > if (disabled) > return 0; > if (already_loaded) > return 1; > return actually_load() ? 1 : 0; > > and "disabled" takes precedence. > > I've added this comment in prepare_commit_graph(): > > /* > * This must come before the "already attempted?" check below, because > * we want to disable even an already-loaded graph file. > */ > if (r->commit_graph_disabled) > return 0; > > if (r->objects->commit_graph_attempted) > return !!r->objects->commit_graph; > r->objects->commit_graph_attempted = 1; > > Does that make more sense?
Ah. That does make sense. I now see the connection between parsing and this change.
Show 9 quoted lines
> Unrelated, but I also notice the top of prepare_commit_graph() has:
>
> if (git_env_bool(GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD, 0))
> die("dying as requested by the '%s' variable on commit-graph load!",
> GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD);
>
> as the very first thing. Meaning we're calling getenv() as part of every
> single parse_commit(), rather than just once per process. Seems like an
> easy efficiency win.Absolutely. Move this to after the "have we attempted already?" condition.
Thanks, -Stolee